AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Richard Kim

Examiner Richard Kim appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 78.0%, they average 1.68 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.68
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2294
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Caley
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2286
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2870 - Optics / Photocopying

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
913
Granted Applications
712
Non-Granted Applications
201
Avg OA / Grant
1.68
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2871
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 78.0% 1.68
Art Unit 41 64.0% 1.93
Group 346 63.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 42 30 71.4%
2009 46 40 87.0%
2010 59 44 74.6%
2011 52 43 82.7%
2012 47 38 80.9%
2013 54 43 79.6%
2014 55 45 81.8%
2015 58 46 79.3%
2016 49 36 73.5%
2017 55 43 78.2%
2018 37 33 89.2%
2019 53 35 66.0%
2020 51 38 74.5%
2021 58 51 87.9%
2022 51 47 92.2%
2023 42 39 92.9%
2024 47 43 91.5%
2025 40 18 45.0%
2026 17 0 0.0%

712 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 907 0.4% 8.7% 86.4% 1.2%
2 412 0.2% 5.8% 92.0% 1.0%
3 162 0.0% 3.7% 93.8% 2.5%
4 70 0.0% 4.3% 95.7% 0.0%
5 27 0.0% 3.7% 92.6% 0.0%
6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
1.2%
2011
1.2%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
1.1%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.2%
2021
1.2%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.