AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tae Kim

Examiner Tae Kim appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 52.9%, they average 3.33 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.33
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5971
Predicted Supervisor
Steven S Paik
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2404
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2880 - Optics / Photocopying

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
361
Granted Applications
191
Non-Granted Applications
170
Avg OA / Grant
3.33
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2876 , 2887
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 52.9% 3.33
Art Unit 19 62.7% 1.88
Group 164 65.8% 1.71
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 24 12 50.0%
2009 31 14 45.2%
2010 12 9 75.0%
2011 21 10 47.6%
2012 21 8 38.1%
2013 12 7 58.3%
2014 27 19 70.4%
2015 21 14 66.7%
2016 16 5 31.3%
2017 15 11 73.3%
2018 25 14 56.0%
2019 25 14 56.0%
2020 12 9 75.0%
2021 19 16 84.2%
2022 22 10 45.5%
2023 15 6 40.0%
2024 11 6 54.5%
2025 24 7 29.2%
2026 8 0 0.0%

191 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 361 0.3% 7.8% 86.1% 4.2%
2 243 0.4% 3.7% 86.8% 8.2%
3 148 0.7% 2.7% 87.8% 8.1%
4 101 2.0% 1.0% 91.1% 5.0%
5 66 1.5% 3.0% 89.4% 6.1%
6 52 3.8% 1.9% 78.8% 15.4%
7 39 0.0% 0.0% 82.1% 17.9%
8 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
9 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 10.0%
10 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
1.4%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
1.7%
2011
0.0%
2012
1.8%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.1%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.8%
2022
0.0%
2023
6.9%
2024
2.5%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.