Examiner Anastasia Midkiff

Grant ratio: 81.4% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2884 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2022
Grant ratio 81.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81560
Primary art unit
2884
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
864
Granted applications
703

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 42 68.1% 1.63
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,501 office actions across 872 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 872 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 473 54.2%
2 OAs 262 30.0%
3 OAs 74 8.5%
4 OAs 48 5.5%
5+ OAs 15 1.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 58.1% 2008 2009: 79.7% 2009 2010: 75.0% 2010 2011: 85.3% 2011 2012: 78.1% 2012 2013: 90.0% 2013 2014: 84.4% 2014 2015: 81.9% 2015 2016: 83.1% 2016 2017: 79.7% 2017 2018: 86.8% 2018 2019: 74.1% 2019 2020: 81.6% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 88.5% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008432558.1%
2009695579.7%
2010685175.0%
2011685885.3%
2012322578.1%
2013807290.0%
2014907684.4%
2015725981.9%
2016594983.1%
2017695579.7%
2018534686.8%
2019584374.1%
2020383181.6%
2021393589.7%
2022262388.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 872 1.0% 22.7% 59.1% 11.0%
Action 2 399 0.3% 18.3% 62.4% 14.3%
Action 3 137 0.7% 20.4% 68.6% 6.6%
Action 4 63 0.0% 17.5% 73.0% 7.9%
Action 5 15 6.7% 6.7% 80.0% 6.7%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 12 of 1,501 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.2%
0.0%
2.2%
0.8%
1.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
41.7% 5/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 2, 2022 15/420,344 Reversed §103
Feb. 10, 2021 15/359,850 Affirmed §103
Dec. 1, 2020 14/611,298 Affirmed §103
Aug. 12, 2020 15/028,736 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 25, 2020 14/268,404 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 4, 2019 14/362,687 Reversed §102
Sep. 14, 2018 14/250,771 Affirmed §103
May. 30, 2017 13/266,692 Reversed §102
May. 25, 2016 12/990,814 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 27, 2013 11/429,139 Affirmed §103
May. 1, 2012 10/503,426 Reversed §103
Dec. 30, 2009 11/393,034 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.