Examiner Casey Bryant

Grant ratio: 72.3% (28th percentile in Art Unit 2884 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.70
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82454
Primary art unit
2884
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
794
Granted applications
574
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1282
Supervisor
Dave Porta
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2444

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 42 68.1% 1.63
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 1,344 office actions across 794 applications
Applications with office actions 98.7% 784 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.3%
1 OA 446 56.2%
2 OAs 200 25.2%
3 OAs 81 10.2%
4 OAs 40 5.0%
5+ OAs 17 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 81.3% 2008 2009: 63.0% 2009 2010: 85.0% 2010 2011: 70.6% 2011 2012: 59.6% 2012 2013: 77.6% 2013 2014: 72.3% 2014 2015: 80.0% 2015 2016: 71.9% 2016 2017: 86.5% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 94.7% 2021 2023: 79.5% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 58.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008322681.3%
2009543463.0%
2010403485.0%
2011513670.6%
2012523159.6%
2013584577.6%
2014473472.3%
2015504080.0%
2016644671.9%
2017524586.5%
2018403690.0%
2019453680.0%
2020242083.3%
2021191894.7%
2023393179.5%
2024363288.9%
2025513058.8%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 784 1.7% 7.3% 72.6% 8.2%
Action 2 338 1.2% 4.7% 82.8% 4.4%
Action 3 138 0.0% 2.2% 87.7% 5.8%
Action 4 57 0.0% 3.5% 84.2% 7.0%
Action 5 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.8% 5 of 178 office actions
All years 1.3% 17 of 1,344 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
5.7%
1.4%
2019: PEG
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
7.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
23.1% 3/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
38.5% 5/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 28, 2025 17/544,168 Affirmed §101
Jun. 23, 2021 15/809,708 Affirmed §103
Apr. 6, 2018 14/378,156 Affirmed §103
Dec. 12, 2017 12/408,219 Reversed §103
Jun. 7, 2016 12/634,349 Reversed §103 · §112
Jan. 22, 2016 10/585,520 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 17, 2014 12/187,815 Affirmed in part N/A
Sep. 19, 2014 12/274,220 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 30, 2014 11/660,121 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 9, 2014 12/256,419 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 27, 2014 10/507,015 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 8, 2013 12/179,803 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.