AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David J. Makiya

Examiner David J. Makiya appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 41.4%, they average 2.09 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.09
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2273
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2880 - Optics / Photocopying

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
391
Granted Applications
162
Non-Granted Applications
229
Avg OA / Grant
2.09
Last OA Observed
January 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2875 , 2884 , 2885
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 41.4% 2.09
Art Unit 7 41.5% 1.67
Group 164 65.8% 1.71
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2020 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 44 13 29.5%
2009 52 25 48.1%
2010 57 21 36.8%
2011 74 33 44.6%
2012 66 29 43.9%
2013 56 33 58.9%
2014 12 6 50.0%
2015 13 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2016.
2017 2 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2018-2019.
2020 5 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2021-2024.
2025 9 2 22.2%
2026 1 0 0.0%

162 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 389 0.5% 12.9% 81.5% 1.0%
2 225 0.0% 7.1% 86.7% 0.4%
3 88 0.0% 2.3% 94.3% 0.0%
4 38 0.0% 5.3% 92.1% 0.0%
5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
14.3%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.