Examiner Mark Tornow

Grant ratio: 72.7% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2891 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86178
Primary art unit
2891
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
763
Granted applications
555
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7534
Supervisor
Matthew Landau
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1731

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 55.9% 1.85
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.01 1,532 office actions across 763 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 762 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 376 49.3%
2 OAs 229 30.0%
3 OAs 54 7.1%
4 OAs 52 6.8%
5+ OAs 51 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 100.0% 2008 2009: 54.5% 2009 2010: 59.1% 2010 2011: 67.3% 2011 2012: 74.2% 2012 2013: 63.9% 2013 2014: 61.2% 2014 2015: 83.7% 2015 2016: 70.7% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 85.7% 2018 2019: 83.0% 2019 2020: 80.6% 2020 2021: 95.1% 2021 2022: 94.9% 2022 2023: 88.4% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 47.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200811100.0%
2009553054.5%
2010442659.1%
2011553767.3%
2012624674.2%
2013362363.9%
2014493061.2%
2015433683.7%
2016412970.7%
2017483675.0%
2018353085.7%
2019473983.0%
2020312580.6%
2021413995.1%
2022393794.9%
2023433888.4%
20243737100.0%
2025341647.1%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 762 0.9% 14.2% 72.6% 3.1%
Action 2 386 0.0% 7.8% 77.5% 9.6%
Action 3 157 0.0% 7.6% 79.0% 10.2%
Action 4 103 1.9% 11.7% 73.8% 11.7%
Action 5 51 0.0% 3.9% 82.4% 11.8%
Action 6 29 0.0% 0.0% 86.2% 13.8%
Action 7 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 76.9% 23.1%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 10 5 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 2 of 133 office actions
All years 0.6% 9 of 1,532 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
3.0%
2019: PEG
1.2%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 14. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 6/14 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 7/14 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 29, 2020 15/003,856 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2019 14/648,629 Reversed §103
Sep. 5, 2018 14/692,516 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 25, 2018 14/311,044 Reversed §103 · §112
May. 14, 2018 14/616,803 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 23, 2017 11/207,791 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 26, 2016 12/334,370 Reversed N/A
Jun. 30, 2016 13/256,249 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §100 · §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 21, 2015 11/991,838 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 31, 2015 10/541,815 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 26, 2014 12/200,160 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 31, 2014 12/303,705 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.