Examiner Quoc Hoang

Grant ratio: 90.8% (94th percentile in Art Unit 2892 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2025
Grant ratio 90.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.25
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77669
Primary art unit
2892
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,230
Granted applications
1,117

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 52.9% 2.18
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.30 1,599 office actions across 1,230 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,226 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.3%
1 OA 1,017 82.7%
2 OAs 129 10.5%
3 OAs 41 3.3%
4 OAs 17 1.4%
5+ OAs 22 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.7% 2008 2009: 82.4% 2009 2010: 92.9% 2010 2011: 95.3% 2011 2012: 91.5% 2012 2013: 98.1% 2013 2014: 95.2% 2014 2015: 95.6% 2015 2016: 97.3% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017 2018: 90.4% 2018 2019: 88.4% 2019 2020: 92.2% 2020 2021: 91.5% 2021 2022: 97.0% 2022 2023: 95.4% 2023 2024: 94.2% 2024 2025: 64.4% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008604066.7%
2009746182.4%
2010706592.9%
2011858195.3%
2012595491.5%
2013525198.1%
2014837995.2%
2015686595.6%
2016737197.3%
20177070100.0%
2018736690.4%
2019696188.4%
2020645992.2%
2021716591.5%
2022666497.0%
2023656295.4%
2024696594.2%
2025593864.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,226 0.5% 27.3% 58.6% 0.4%
Action 2 209 0.0% 11.0% 77.0% 1.4%
Action 3 80 0.0% 12.5% 77.5% 1.3%
Action 4 39 0.0% 7.7% 76.9% 5.1%
Action 5 22 0.0% 13.6% 68.2% 4.5%
Action 6 10 0.0% 30.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 174 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,599 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 28, 2025 17/200,951 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 15, 2022 16/196,091 Affirmed §103
Dec. 15, 2012 11/221,146 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.