Examiner Ajay K. Arora

Grant ratio: 80.4% (79th percentile in Art Unit 2892 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.71. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 80.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.71
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81922
Primary art unit
2892
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
919
Granted applications
739
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8347
Supervisor
Drew Richards
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1736

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 52.9% 2.18
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.75 1,609 office actions across 919 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 918 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 538 58.5%
2 OAs 226 24.6%
3 OAs 82 8.9%
4 OAs 41 4.5%
5+ OAs 31 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.5% 2008 2009: 69.4% 2009 2010: 75.8% 2010 2011: 81.1% 2011 2012: 83.1% 2012 2013: 82.8% 2013 2014: 77.8% 2014 2015: 91.4% 2015 2016: 87.8% 2016 2017: 89.8% 2017 2018: 79.6% 2018 2019: 100.0% 2019 2020: 89.1% 2020 2021: 88.1% 2021 2022: 92.7% 2022 2023: 95.0% 2023 2024: 95.1% 2024 2025: 42.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291965.5%
2009493469.4%
2010665075.8%
2011534381.1%
2012836983.1%
2013584882.8%
2014544277.8%
2015585391.4%
2016413687.8%
2017494489.8%
2018493979.6%
20193838100.0%
2020464189.1%
2021595288.1%
2022413892.7%
2023403895.0%
2024413995.1%
2025381642.1%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 918 0.4% 7.2% 89.7% 1.0%
Action 2 380 0.0% 4.2% 94.2% 0.5%
Action 3 154 0.0% 1.9% 95.5% 1.3%
Action 4 72 0.0% 1.4% 97.2% 0.0%
Action 5 31 0.0% 6.5% 93.5% 0.0%
Action 6 22 0.0% 4.5% 90.9% 4.5%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 152 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 1,609 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.7%
1.1%
3.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 26, 2024 16/754,992 Reversed §103
Mar. 30, 2017 12/503,695 Affirmed §103
Jul. 15, 2016 13/157,994 Reversed §103
May. 24, 2016 12/887,067 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 17, 2015 12/503,915 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.