Examiner Thanh Nguyen

Grant ratio: 75.4% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2893 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74457
Primary art unit
2893
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
943
Granted applications
711
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1695
Supervisor
Yara Green
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3035

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 50.2% 1.68
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.85 1,740 office actions across 943 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 943 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 508 53.9%
2 OAs 237 25.1%
3 OAs 108 11.5%
4 OAs 51 5.4%
5+ OAs 39 4.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 63.5% 2008 2009: 51.7% 2009 2010: 77.3% 2010 2011: 65.2% 2011 2012: 87.3% 2012 2013: 72.0% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 85.2% 2015 2016: 82.4% 2016 2017: 88.1% 2017 2018: 87.8% 2018 2019: 86.0% 2019 2020: 78.8% 2020 2021: 95.9% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 90.0% 2023 2024: 93.0% 2024 2025: 58.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008634063.5%
2009583051.7%
2010443477.3%
2011664365.2%
2012554887.3%
2013503672.0%
2014443681.8%
2015544685.2%
2016514282.4%
2017595288.1%
2018413687.8%
2019504386.0%
2020332678.8%
2021494795.9%
20224545100.0%
2023403690.0%
2024434093.0%
2025533158.5%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 943 0.3% 14.5% 68.8% 0.8%
Action 2 435 0.0% 9.2% 77.5% 1.6%
Action 3 198 0.0% 4.5% 84.3% 1.5%
Action 4 90 0.0% 2.2% 92.2% 2.2%
Action 5 39 0.0% 7.7% 82.1% 2.6%
Action 6 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 225 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,740 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2015 12/020,957 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 24, 2015 12/653,440 Affirmed §103
Nov. 14, 2013 12/142,757 Reversed N/A
Dec. 18, 2012 10/556,245 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 28, 2010 10/703,355 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2010 11/175,582 Rehearing Decision-Granted §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.