AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mitchell Siegel

Appears inactive Last observed office action: December 2024 (15 months ago).

Examiner Mitchell Siegel appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 97.6%, they average 1.12 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.12
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
17 years (2008-2024)
Tech Center
2900 - Designs
Group
2900-WG - 2900-WG

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
844
Granted Applications
824
Non-Granted Applications
20
Avg OA / Grant
1.12
Last OA Observed
December 2024 (15 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2912
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 97.6% 1.12
Art Unit 34 96.4% 1.20
Group 461 95.1% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.9% 1.20
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 87 82 94.3%
2009 56 54 96.4%
2010 29 29 100.0%
2011 39 39 100.0%
2012 59 59 100.0%
2013 66 64 97.0%
2014 43 41 95.3%
2015 43 41 95.3%
2016 37 34 91.9%
2017 33 33 100.0%
2018 41 40 97.6%
2019 90 90 100.0%
2020 48 48 100.0%
2021 37 37 100.0%
2022 48 48 100.0%
2023 50 47 94.0%
2024 38 38 100.0%
No observed data after 2024; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

824 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 844 0.0% 0.9% 2.6% 46.4%
2 97 0.0% 0.0% 6.2% 71.1%
3 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.8%
4 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%