AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Carol Rademaker

Appears inactive Last observed office action: June 2016 (118 months ago).

Examiner Carol Rademaker appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 96.4%, they average 1.22 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.22
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2008-2016)
Tech Center
2900 - Designs
Group
2900-WG - 2900-WG

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
169
Granted Applications
163
Non-Granted Applications
6
Avg OA / Grant
1.22
Last OA Observed
June 2016 (118 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2912
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 96.4% 1.22
Art Unit 34 96.4% 1.20
Group 461 95.1% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.9% 1.20
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 17 17 100.0%
2009 20 20 100.0%
2010 11 10 90.9%
2011 23 21 91.3%
2012 28 27 96.4%
2013 27 25 92.6%
2014 17 17 100.0%
2015 20 20 100.0%
2016 6 6 100.0%
No observed data after 2016; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

163 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 169 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 75.7%
2 34 0.0% 0.0% 11.8% 76.5%
3 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%