AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Abraham Bahta

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2025 (7 months ago).

Examiner Abraham Bahta appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 96.5%, they average 1.19 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.19
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2900 - Designs
Group
2900-WG - 2900-WG

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
706
Granted Applications
681
Non-Granted Applications
25
Avg OA / Grant
1.19
Last OA Observed
September 2025 (7 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2913
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 96.5% 1.19
Art Unit 29 92.7% 1.24
Group 461 95.1% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.9% 1.20
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 2 2 100.0%
No observed data for 2009-2010.
2011 49 46 93.9%
2012 33 31 93.9%
2013 50 48 96.0%
2014 29 28 96.6%
2015 69 67 97.1%
2016 66 62 93.9%
2017 63 62 98.4%
2018 53 50 94.3%
2019 44 43 97.7%
2020 78 78 100.0%
2021 47 47 100.0%
2022 33 33 100.0%
2023 30 27 90.0%
2024 53 52 98.1%
2025 7 5 71.4%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

681 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 706 0.0% 3.3% 4.5% 40.1%
2 112 0.0% 8.0% 8.9% 44.6%
3 16 6.3% 6.3% 31.3% 56.3%
4 8 0.0% 12.5% 62.5% 25.0%
5 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.4%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.