AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Emily A Caven

Potentially inactive Last observed office action: October 2025 (6 months ago).

Examiner Emily A Caven appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 98.0%, they average 1.18 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.18
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2022-2025)
Tech Center
2900 - Designs
Group
2900-WG - 2900-WG

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
149
Granted Applications
146
Non-Granted Applications
3
Avg OA / Grant
1.18
Last OA Observed
October 2025 (6 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2915
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 98.0% 1.18
Art Unit 29 95.1% 1.24
Group 461 95.1% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.9% 1.20
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 17 17 100.0%
2023 47 47 100.0%
2024 67 66 98.5%
2025 18 16 88.9%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

146 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 149 0.0% 24.8% 0.7% 71.8%
2 29 0.0% 24.1% 0.0% 72.4%