Examiner Bridget L. Eland

Grant ratio: 98.8% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2916 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.24. Most common rejection type: §112.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2024
Grant ratio 98.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.24
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82812
Primary art unit
2916
Work group
2900-WG
Technology center
2900
Applications
735
Granted applications
726

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 96.3% 1.23
Group 461 94.9% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.6% 1.20
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.24 913 office actions across 735 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 735 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 593 80.7%
2 OAs 121 16.5%
3 OAs 13 1.8%
4 OAs 5 0.7%
5+ OAs 3 0.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 98.2% 2008 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 96.7% 2011 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 97.7% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 91.7% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2019: 100.0% 2019 2020: 99.0% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 93.2% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008565598.2%
20093636100.0%
20103535100.0%
2011605896.7%
20125151100.0%
2013434297.7%
20143030100.0%
2015121191.7%
20162323100.0%
20171212100.0%
201888100.0%
20195757100.0%
202010110099.0%
20216868100.0%
20225555100.0%
20234444100.0%
2024444193.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 735 0.0% 17.6% 9.9% 42.9%
Action 2 142 0.0% 17.6% 18.3% 48.6%
Action 3 21 0.0% 9.5% 28.6% 47.6%
Action 4 8 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 5 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 74 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 913 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 2, 2020 29/361,552 Reversed §102
Mar. 27, 2020 29/453,864 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.