AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tiphany Dickerson

Appears inactive Last observed office action: January 2021 (63 months ago).

Examiner Tiphany Dickerson appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 18.2%, they average 3.62 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.62
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2008-2021)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
274
Granted Applications
50
Non-Granted Applications
224
Avg OA / Grant
3.62
Last OA Observed
January 2021 (63 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3623 , 3624
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 18.2% 3.62
Art Unit 43 27.8% 2.96
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 5 1 20.0%
2009 27 4 14.8%
2010 30 7 23.3%
2011 21 6 28.6%
2012 32 9 28.1%
2013 16 3 18.8%
2014 20 0 0.0%
2015 14 2 14.3%
2016 25 4 16.0%
2017 24 4 16.7%
2018 25 6 24.0%
2019 14 3 21.4%
2020 20 1 5.0%
2021 1 0 0.0%
No observed data after 2021; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

50 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 288 1.4% 13.2% 83.3% 0.7%
2 226 4.4% 7.1% 86.7% 0.0%
3 151 6.6% 2.6% 87.4% 2.0%
4 112 11.6% 4.5% 83.0% 0.9%
5 61 14.8% 4.9% 78.7% 1.6%
6 40 20.0% 0.0% 75.0% 5.0%
7 21 9.5% 0.0% 85.7% 4.8%
8 15 20.0% 0.0% 73.3% 6.7%
9 8 25.0% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0%
10 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
1.8%
2009
1.2%
2010
0.0%
2011
3.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
3.0%
2014
13.0%
2015
9.8%
2016
15.4%
2017
26.0%
2018
6.0%
2019
20.5%
2020
0.0%
2021

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.