AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Julie M. Shanker

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2025 (8 months ago).

Examiner Julie M. Shanker appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 14.4%, they average 3.13 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.13
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2010-2025)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
278
Granted Applications
40
Non-Granted Applications
238
Avg OA / Grant
3.13
Last OA Observed
September 2025 (8 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3626 , 3689
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 14.4% 3.13
Art Unit 33 14.1% 2.82
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2010; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2010 1 0 0.0%
2011 15 0 0.0%
2012 28 1 3.6%
2013 20 0 0.0%
2014 31 1 3.2%
2015 32 1 3.1%
2016 30 4 13.3%
2017 10 0 0.0%
2018 18 5 27.8%
2019 15 7 46.7%
2020 16 7 43.8%
2021 11 5 45.5%
2022 12 4 33.3%
2023 16 3 18.8%
2024 14 1 7.1%
2025 9 1 11.1%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

40 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 283 3.9% 8.1% 82.0% 2.5%
2 195 24.1% 4.6% 66.2% 4.6%
3 119 19.3% 1.7% 72.3% 5.0%
4 84 19.0% 2.4% 72.6% 4.8%
5 53 13.2% 1.9% 81.1% 1.9%
6 35 22.9% 0.0% 68.6% 5.7%
7 15 26.7% 6.7% 66.7% 0.0%
8 8 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
9 6 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
4.5%
2010
4.6%
2011
0.9%
2012
7.0%
2013
2.9%
2014
13.6%
2015
15.5%
2016
24.0%
2017
35.0%
2018
16.0%
2019
20.0%
2020
35.0%
2021
41.4%
2022
36.4%
2023
64.5%
2024
45.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.