AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Liza Tony Kanaan

Examiner Liza Tony Kanaan appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 15.1%, they average 2.80 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.80
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-4664
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
166
Granted Applications
25
Non-Granted Applications
141
Avg OA / Grant
2.80
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3626 , 3683
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 15.1% 2.80
Art Unit 62 22.5% 2.89
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 2 0 0.0%
2021 14 2 14.3%
2022 31 13 41.9%
2023 22 7 31.8%
2024 25 2 8.0%
2025 38 1 2.6%
2026 34 0 0.0%

25 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 164 1.8% 14.0% 79.9% 3.7%
2 115 4.3% 14.8% 79.1% 0.9%
3 59 5.1% 8.5% 74.6% 11.9%
4 34 11.8% 5.9% 79.4% 2.9%
5 18 16.7% 5.6% 77.8% 0.0%
6 10 40.0% 10.0% 50.0% 0.0%
7 5 40.0% 0.0% 40.0% 20.0%
8 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
5.4%
2023
13.9%
2024
9.5%
2025
8.8%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.