AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kimberly T Wood

Examiner Kimberly T Wood appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 50.9%, they average 2.29 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.29
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6826
Predicted Supervisor
Jonathan Liu
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-8227
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3630 - Static Structures, Supports and Furniture

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,167
Granted Applications
594
Non-Granted Applications
573
Avg OA / Grant
2.29
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3631 , 3632
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 50.9% 2.29
Art Unit 15 54.3% 1.89
Group 175 54.3% 1.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 75 32 42.7%
2009 88 31 35.2%
2010 53 20 37.7%
2011 76 47 61.8%
2012 63 34 54.0%
2013 60 25 41.7%
2014 44 26 59.1%
2015 52 20 38.5%
2016 61 32 52.5%
2017 59 32 54.2%
2018 52 33 63.5%
2019 66 40 60.6%
2020 68 33 48.5%
2021 59 31 52.5%
2022 64 37 57.8%
2023 68 55 80.9%
2024 54 43 79.6%
2025 81 23 28.4%
2026 24 0 0.0%

594 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,167 0.0% 20.9% 66.3% 11.1%
2 692 0.4% 15.9% 69.5% 12.4%
3 330 0.0% 12.4% 73.9% 12.7%
4 192 0.5% 11.5% 72.4% 15.1%
5 79 0.0% 15.2% 70.9% 12.7%
6 46 0.0% 4.3% 78.3% 17.4%
7 21 0.0% 4.8% 95.2% 0.0%
8 16 0.0% 6.3% 87.5% 6.3%
9 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.8%
2015
1.1%
2016
0.7%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.