AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Christopher P Ellis

Examiner Christopher P Ellis appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 79.2%, they average 1.29 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.29
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6914
Predicted Supervisor
Tim Collins
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6886
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3640 - Aeronautics, Agriculture, Weaponry, Nuclear Systems, Licensing and Review

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
744
Granted Applications
589
Non-Granted Applications
155
Avg OA / Grant
1.29
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3644
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 79.2% 1.29
Art Unit 33 69.3% 1.55
Group 269 56.4% 1.75
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 6 6 100.0%
2009 64 56 87.5%
2010 53 45 84.9%
2011 48 43 89.6%
2012 63 55 87.3%
2013 31 25 80.6%
2014 53 44 83.0%
2015 27 21 77.8%
2016 21 18 85.7%
2017 37 29 78.4%
2018 46 38 82.6%
2019 33 27 81.8%
2020 36 28 77.8%
2021 42 33 78.6%
2022 48 33 68.8%
2023 55 43 78.2%
2024 42 34 81.0%
2025 27 11 40.7%
2026 12 0 0.0%

589 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 744 1.6% 21.2% 45.6% 5.2%
2 145 0.7% 19.3% 50.3% 13.1%
3 54 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 3.7%
4 17 5.9% 11.8% 70.6% 0.0%
5 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
6 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
7 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
1.0%
2009
1.5%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
1.8%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
2.4%
2017
3.6%
2018
2.4%
2019
0.0%
2020
3.2%
2021
6.1%
2022
4.7%
2023
1.8%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.