AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kyle J Kingsland

Examiner Kyle J Kingsland appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 59.1%, they average 1.90 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.90
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3268
Predicted Supervisor
Abby Flynn
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-9855
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
254
Granted Applications
150
Non-Granted Applications
104
Avg OA / Grant
1.90
Last OA Observed
July 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3663
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 59.1% 1.90
Art Unit 51 57.7% 1.91
Group 455 54.8% 1.86
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 3 1 33.3%
2021 31 25 80.6%
2022 43 33 76.7%
2023 37 29 78.4%
2024 48 37 77.1%
2025 58 25 43.1%
2026 34 0 0.0%

150 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 250 2.4% 18.0% 72.0% 7.2%
2 149 0.7% 8.7% 88.6% 0.7%
3 57 1.8% 1.8% 96.5% 0.0%
4 33 0.0% 3.0% 93.9% 3.0%
5 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
3.9%
2024
1.0%
2025
4.7%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.