AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Hossam M Abd El Latif

Examiner Hossam M Abd El Latif appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 62.9%, they average 1.77 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.77
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5869
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
299
Granted Applications
188
Non-Granted Applications
111
Avg OA / Grant
1.77
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3664 , 3665 , 3666
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 62.9% 1.77
Art Unit 74 61.1% 1.72
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 10 8 80.0%
2020 43 33 76.7%
2021 44 38 86.4%
2022 44 36 81.8%
2023 26 19 73.1%
2024 44 33 75.0%
2025 67 21 31.3%
2026 21 0 0.0%

188 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 297 3.4% 6.4% 84.2% 1.3%
2 136 2.9% 5.1% 88.2% 2.2%
3 56 1.8% 3.6% 91.1% 3.6%
4 25 0.0% 4.0% 96.0% 0.0%
5 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.3%
2021
1.5%
2022
0.0%
2023
3.5%
2024
6.6%
2025
14.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.