AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Matthew D. Troutman

Examiner Matthew D. Troutman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 70.3%, they average 1.81 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.81
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
20 years (2007-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3654
Predicted Supervisor
Joe Thomas
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-8004
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3670 - Wells, Earth Boring/Moving, Mining, Harvesters, Bridges, Roads, Petroleum

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
590
Granted Applications
415
Non-Granted Applications
175
Avg OA / Grant
1.81
Last OA Observed
January 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3671 , 3679
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 70.3% 1.81
Art Unit 34 58.8% 1.61
Group 235 60.7% 1.84
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 4 0 0.0%
2008 32 15 46.9%
2009 16 9 56.3%
No observed data for 2010.
2011 35 22 62.9%
2012 44 24 54.5%
2013 67 50 74.6%
2014 73 51 69.9%
2015 61 40 65.6%
2016 49 42 85.7%
2017 78 62 79.5%
2018 57 46 80.7%
2019 58 46 79.3%
2020 12 8 66.7%
No observed data for 2021-2024.
2025 3 0 0.0%
2026 1 0 0.0%

415 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 597 0.5% 13.1% 70.5% 7.2%
2 287 0.0% 10.1% 73.2% 10.5%
3 108 0.0% 12.0% 76.9% 7.4%
4 48 0.0% 14.6% 75.0% 6.3%
5 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
6 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.8%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
1.0%
2018
1.1%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.