AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Chad A Newton

Examiner Chad A Newton appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 26.2%, they average 3.35 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.35
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(313) 446-6604
Predicted Supervisor
Peter H. Choi
Supervisor Phone
(469) 295-9171
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
282
Granted Applications
74
Non-Granted Applications
208
Avg OA / Grant
3.35
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3681 , 3686
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 26.2% 3.35
Art Unit 42 32.4% 2.69
Group 287 29.0% 2.80
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 6 0 0.0%
2017 13 1 7.7%
2018 18 11 61.1%
2019 17 9 52.9%
2020 15 5 33.3%
2021 24 5 20.8%
2022 26 11 42.3%
2023 35 12 34.3%
2024 35 14 40.0%
2025 40 6 15.0%
2026 53 0 0.0%

74 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 279 8.2% 11.5% 75.6% 0.4%
2 185 14.6% 26.5% 53.5% 4.3%
3 122 22.1% 13.9% 61.5% 1.6%
4 92 15.2% 6.5% 77.2% 1.1%
5 58 8.6% 1.7% 87.9% 1.7%
6 37 8.1% 2.7% 86.5% 0.0%
7 23 4.3% 4.3% 87.0% 0.0%
8 17 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 0.0%
9 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 9 22.2% 0.0% 77.8% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
19.3%
2017
26.4%
2018
2.9%
2019
2.5%
2020
4.9%
2021
1.9%
2022
8.3%
2023
13.0%
2024
28.3%
2025
21.9%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.