AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Rachael Sojin Stone

Examiner Rachael Sojin Stone appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 40.0%, they average 2.39 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.39
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8798
Predicted Supervisor
Marc Jimenez
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4530
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
140
Granted Applications
56
Non-Granted Applications
84
Avg OA / Grant
2.39
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3681 , 3686
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 40.0% 2.39
Art Unit 42 32.4% 2.69
Group 287 29.0% 2.80
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 3 0 0.0%
2020 14 5 35.7%
2021 25 17 68.0%
2022 26 20 76.9%
2023 12 7 58.3%
2024 14 3 21.4%
2025 24 4 16.7%
2026 22 0 0.0%

56 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 147 6.8% 25.2% 65.3% 0.0%
2 89 28.1% 5.6% 61.8% 1.1%
3 54 44.4% 5.6% 48.1% 1.9%
4 34 47.1% 0.0% 52.9% 0.0%
5 22 54.5% 0.0% 36.4% 0.0%
6 12 83.3% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0%
7 4 75.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0%
8 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
13.0%
2021
33.8%
2022
56.8%
2023
47.5%
2024
36.2%
2025
47.8%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.