AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Aaisha Abdullah

Examiner Aaisha Abdullah appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 16.1%, they average 3.60 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.60
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5668
Predicted Supervisor
Peter H Choi
Supervisor Phone
(469) 295-9171
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
62
Granted Applications
10
Non-Granted Applications
52
Avg OA / Grant
3.60
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3681 , 3686
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 16.1% 3.60
Art Unit 44 32.7% 2.70
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 1 0 0.0%
2021 2 0 0.0%
2022 12 4 33.3%
2023 9 0 0.0%
2024 13 5 38.5%
2025 15 1 6.7%
2026 10 0 0.0%

10 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 58 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 0.0%
2 44 6.8% 4.5% 88.6% 0.0%
3 30 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
4 24 29.2% 0.0% 70.8% 0.0%
5 10 10.0% 0.0% 90.0% 0.0%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
3.9%
2022
29.4%
2023
11.8%
2024
3.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.