AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mustafa Iqbal

Examiner Mustafa Iqbal appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 40.1%, they average 2.34 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.34
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(469) 295-9241
Predicted Supervisor
Beth Boswell
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6737
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
342
Granted Applications
137
Non-Granted Applications
205
Avg OA / Grant
2.34
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3623 , 3625 , 3683
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 40.1% 2.34
Art Unit 32 25.3% 3.00
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 1 0 0.0%
2017 19 0 0.0%
2018 22 3 13.6%
2019 38 9 23.7%
2020 37 13 35.1%
2021 27 16 59.3%
2022 45 28 62.2%
2023 43 26 60.5%
2024 45 28 62.2%
2025 45 14 31.1%
2026 20 0 0.0%

137 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 332 3.9% 1.2% 88.9% 0.3%
2 226 42.9% 1.8% 50.9% 2.2%
3 126 58.7% 0.8% 36.5% 3.2%
4 79 55.7% 0.0% 38.0% 5.1%
5 22 72.7% 0.0% 27.3% 0.0%
6 12 58.3% 0.0% 33.3% 8.3%
7 4 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
8 4 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
9 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.5%
2017
14.0%
2018
12.6%
2019
20.0%
2020
27.5%
2021
47.2%
2022
45.7%
2023
46.3%
2024
53.4%
2025
61.9%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.