AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Amber A. Misiaszek

Examiner Amber A. Misiaszek appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 42.7%, they average 2.70 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.70
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1362
Predicted Supervisor
Fonya Long
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5096
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
649
Granted Applications
277
Non-Granted Applications
372
Avg OA / Grant
2.70
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3624 , 3626 , 3682 , 3684 , 3686
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 42.7% 2.70
Art Unit 42 19.4% 3.26
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 24 8 33.3%
2009 48 33 68.8%
2010 30 22 73.3%
2011 26 17 65.4%
2012 29 17 58.6%
2013 21 9 42.9%
2014 30 1 3.3%
2015 32 1 3.1%
2016 47 16 34.0%
2017 38 7 18.4%
2018 33 11 33.3%
2019 42 21 50.0%
2020 34 17 50.0%
2021 28 17 60.7%
2022 38 25 65.8%
2023 32 23 71.9%
2024 47 22 46.8%
2025 47 10 21.3%
2026 23 0 0.0%

277 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 645 16.0% 46.7% 35.5% 0.2%
2 433 42.7% 18.9% 37.4% 0.5%
3 280 37.9% 11.1% 48.6% 1.8%
4 193 51.3% 5.2% 42.0% 1.6%
5 114 53.5% 2.6% 40.4% 3.5%
6 80 62.5% 2.5% 32.5% 2.5%
7 43 65.1% 0.0% 34.9% 0.0%
8 26 69.2% 0.0% 30.8% 0.0%
9 15 73.3% 0.0% 26.7% 0.0%
10 9 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
3.2%
2014
51.7%
2015
60.3%
2016
66.0%
2017
55.3%
2018
68.8%
2019
77.1%
2020
40.3%
2021
63.4%
2022
78.0%
2023
64.9%
2024
60.7%
2025
82.6%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.