AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Matthew Zimmerman

Examiner Matthew Zimmerman appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 48.8%, they average 2.59 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.59
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5278
Predicted Supervisor
Jeff Smith
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6763
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
570
Granted Applications
278
Non-Granted Applications
292
Avg OA / Grant
2.59
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3625 , 3683 , 3684 , 3688
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 48.8% 2.59
Art Unit 24 36.3% 2.38
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 13 2 15.4%
2009 52 26 50.0%
2010 29 16 55.2%
2011 29 13 44.8%
2012 25 15 60.0%
2013 34 18 52.9%
2014 24 11 45.8%
2015 47 9 19.1%
2016 51 18 35.3%
2017 39 19 48.7%
2018 40 25 62.5%
2019 31 16 51.6%
2020 23 14 60.9%
2021 36 24 66.7%
2022 30 22 73.3%
2023 20 18 90.0%
2024 13 8 61.5%
2025 23 4 17.4%
2026 11 0 0.0%

278 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 551 18.5% 18.3% 59.7% 2.2%
2 361 44.3% 10.8% 32.7% 10.0%
3 218 40.8% 7.3% 41.7% 9.2%
4 139 41.7% 5.0% 40.3% 12.2%
5 73 43.8% 4.1% 41.1% 11.0%
6 44 59.1% 2.3% 31.8% 6.8%
7 20 50.0% 0.0% 35.0% 15.0%
8 9 44.4% 0.0% 22.2% 33.3%
9 4 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
5.6%
2009
13.4%
2010
23.4%
2011
13.3%
2012
21.1%
2013
29.1%
2014
45.8%
2015
55.1%
2016
63.0%
2017
77.9%
2018
41.4%
2019
36.4%
2020
41.0%
2021
62.5%
2022
43.2%
2023
46.4%
2024
41.7%
2025
18.2%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.