AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Olabode Akintola

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2019 (78 months ago).

Examiner Olabode Akintola appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 18.2%, they average 2.73 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.73
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2008-2019)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3690 - Business Methods - Finance/Banking/ Insurance and Business Cryptography

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
203
Granted Applications
37
Non-Granted Applications
166
Avg OA / Grant
2.73
Last OA Observed
September 2019 (78 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3691
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 18.2% 2.73
Art Unit 26 39.0% 2.71
Group 163 34.9% 2.69
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 13 2 15.4%
2009 29 9 31.0%
2010 21 5 23.8%
2011 17 4 23.5%
2012 17 5 29.4%
2013 24 5 20.8%
2014 29 0 0.0%
2015 32 0 0.0%
2016 13 1 7.7%
2017 1 0 0.0%
2018 4 3 75.0%
2019 3 3 100.0%
No observed data after 2019; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

37 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 230 4.8% 19.1% 73.0% 0.4%
2 158 3.8% 10.1% 81.6% 0.6%
3 106 5.7% 7.5% 83.0% 1.9%
4 77 7.8% 2.6% 88.3% 1.3%
5 38 21.1% 2.6% 73.7% 2.6%
6 20 30.0% 5.0% 65.0% 0.0%
7 11 18.2% 9.1% 72.7% 0.0%
8 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
8.6%
2008
2.5%
2009
1.4%
2010
3.8%
2011
1.8%
2012
1.0%
2013
9.0%
2014
21.4%
2015
29.2%
2016
30.8%
2017
20.0%
2018
18.2%
2019
0.0%
2020

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.