AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sima Asgari

Examiner Sima Asgari appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 17.4%, they average 4.03 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 4.03
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
10 years (2017-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2037
Predicted Supervisor
Mr. Calvin Hewitt
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6709
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
190
Granted Applications
33
Non-Granted Applications
157
Avg OA / Grant
4.03
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3685 , 3698 , 3699
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 17.4% 4.03
Art Unit 59 34.4% 3.05
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2017; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2017 5 2 40.0%
2018 15 2 13.3%
2019 26 5 19.2%
2020 24 1 4.2%
2021 13 2 15.4%
2022 20 3 15.0%
2023 24 10 41.7%
2024 15 3 20.0%
2025 37 5 13.5%
2026 11 0 0.0%

33 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 177 0.0% 5.1% 92.1% 1.1%
2 143 0.7% 0.0% 91.6% 6.3%
3 109 0.0% 2.8% 91.7% 4.6%
4 79 2.5% 2.5% 89.9% 3.8%
5 45 2.2% 4.4% 91.1% 2.2%
6 36 0.0% 2.8% 88.9% 8.3%
7 20 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
7.7%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
4.6%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.