AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner James Triggs

Examiner James Triggs appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.8%, they average 1.23 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.23
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
17 years (2010-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3411
Predicted Supervisor
J. Allen Shriver
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6698
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3610 - Surface Transportation

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,430
Granted Applications
1,212
Non-Granted Applications
218
Avg OA / Grant
1.23
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3614 , 3615 , 3618
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.8% 1.23
Art Unit 23 67.8% 1.52
Group 159 60.2% 1.45
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2010; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2010 31 20 64.5%
2011 80 56 70.0%
2012 137 116 84.7%
2013 150 127 84.7%
2014 116 99 85.3%
2015 93 81 87.1%
2016 105 95 90.5%
2017 91 88 96.7%
2018 104 100 96.2%
2019 66 63 95.5%
2020 75 66 88.0%
2021 51 49 96.1%
2022 57 51 89.5%
2023 106 101 95.3%
2024 72 67 93.1%
2025 60 33 55.0%
2026 36 0 0.0%

1,212 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,430 0.3% 5.9% 76.2% 12.7%
2 253 0.4% 6.3% 81.0% 9.5%
3 59 0.0% 0.0% 81.4% 13.6%
4 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
5 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.8%
2016
0.9%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
2.3%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.