AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Richard W. Crandall

Examiner Richard W. Crandall appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 25.3%, they average 2.80 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.80
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(313) 446-6562
Predicted Supervisor
Anita Coupe
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3614
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
348
Granted Applications
88
Non-Granted Applications
260
Avg OA / Grant
2.80
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3619 , 3689
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 25.3% 2.80
Art Unit 33 13.9% 2.82
Group 287 29.0% 2.80
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 4 0 0.0%
2017 32 0 0.0%
2018 28 2 7.1%
2019 29 8 27.6%
2020 33 15 45.5%
2021 34 15 44.1%
2022 46 12 26.1%
2023 31 14 45.2%
2024 37 11 29.7%
2025 30 11 36.7%
2026 44 0 0.0%

88 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 340 4.4% 4.1% 88.2% 1.2%
2 202 13.4% 1.5% 80.7% 3.5%
3 108 20.4% 0.9% 74.1% 3.7%
4 60 20.0% 0.0% 76.7% 3.3%
5 21 4.8% 0.0% 85.7% 9.5%
6 18 5.6% 0.0% 83.3% 11.1%
7 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
7.2%
2017
10.0%
2018
10.1%
2019
5.5%
2020
8.7%
2021
10.5%
2022
16.3%
2023
9.6%
2024
12.8%
2025
14.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.