AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Saba Dagnew

Examiner Saba Dagnew appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 34.9%, they average 3.14 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.14
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3271
Predicted Supervisor
Waseem Ashraf
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3948
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
637
Granted Applications
222
Non-Granted Applications
415
Avg OA / Grant
3.14
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3621 , 3682 , 3688
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 34.9% 3.14
Art Unit 20 40.2% 2.63
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 20 2 10.0%
2009 32 7 21.9%
2010 18 7 38.9%
2011 25 2 8.0%
2012 30 6 20.0%
2013 31 12 38.7%
2014 26 3 11.5%
2015 31 0 0.0%
2016 31 4 12.9%
2017 41 2 4.9%
2018 38 12 31.6%
2019 35 17 48.6%
2020 52 29 55.8%
2021 38 21 55.3%
2022 37 26 70.3%
2023 49 37 75.5%
2024 33 27 81.8%
2025 53 8 15.1%
2026 17 0 0.0%

222 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 631 2.2% 22.0% 71.5% 0.0%
2 473 7.4% 12.7% 77.0% 0.8%
3 308 9.7% 8.8% 79.2% 0.0%
4 225 11.1% 9.3% 76.9% 0.9%
5 127 19.7% 7.1% 71.7% 0.8%
6 84 21.4% 4.8% 70.2% 2.4%
7 49 14.3% 0.0% 83.7% 0.0%
8 33 9.1% 3.0% 84.8% 3.0%
9 16 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
10 11 27.3% 0.0% 72.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.9%
2008
0.9%
2009
2.5%
2010
1.8%
2011
0.0%
2012
3.2%
2013
4.2%
2014
15.1%
2015
18.1%
2016
6.7%
2017
14.7%
2018
17.8%
2019
24.3%
2020
8.3%
2021
8.2%
2022
6.7%
2023
7.6%
2024
13.2%
2025
17.6%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.