AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Dilek B Cobanoglu

Examiner Dilek B Cobanoglu appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 29.1%, they average 2.92 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.92
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8295
Predicted Supervisor
Obeid Mamon
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1813
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
547
Granted Applications
159
Non-Granted Applications
388
Avg OA / Grant
2.92
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3626 , 3686 , 3687
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 29.1% 2.92
Art Unit 62 22.5% 2.89
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 20 3 15.0%
2009 36 15 41.7%
2010 29 12 41.4%
2011 26 16 61.5%
2012 30 18 60.0%
2013 17 10 58.8%
2014 20 3 15.0%
2015 27 1 3.7%
2016 24 1 4.2%
2017 33 6 18.2%
2018 33 13 39.4%
2019 29 8 27.6%
2020 32 10 31.3%
2021 31 10 32.3%
2022 28 11 39.3%
2023 30 12 40.0%
2024 32 6 18.8%
2025 41 4 9.8%
2026 29 0 0.0%

159 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 543 7.7% 38.5% 51.0% 0.7%
2 404 37.9% 17.6% 42.1% 1.5%
3 252 45.6% 16.7% 36.1% 1.6%
4 166 50.0% 12.7% 34.9% 1.2%
5 97 53.6% 10.3% 35.1% 1.0%
6 63 66.7% 7.9% 20.6% 4.8%
7 36 69.4% 5.6% 19.4% 2.8%
8 24 70.8% 4.2% 20.8% 4.2%
9 14 71.4% 0.0% 21.4% 7.1%
10 8 87.5% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
1.1%
2010
1.3%
2011
1.3%
2012
0.0%
2013
4.3%
2014
26.2%
2015
52.3%
2016
54.1%
2017
68.2%
2018
51.2%
2019
54.9%
2020
42.0%
2021
39.2%
2022
54.2%
2023
55.0%
2024
62.0%
2025
69.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.