AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Carrie S Gilkey

Examiner Carrie S Gilkey appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 15.2%, they average 3.79 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.79
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7119
Predicted Supervisor
Jessica Lemieux
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3445
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
526
Granted Applications
80
Non-Granted Applications
446
Avg OA / Grant
3.79
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3626 , 3689
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 15.2% 3.79
Art Unit 33 14.1% 2.82
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 13 1 7.7%
2009 40 0 0.0%
2010 30 5 16.7%
2011 27 0 0.0%
2012 24 1 4.2%
2013 40 9 22.5%
2014 27 2 7.4%
2015 27 3 11.1%
2016 33 6 18.2%
2017 38 5 13.2%
2018 15 4 26.7%
2019 20 3 15.0%
2020 30 9 30.0%
2021 22 10 45.5%
2022 23 2 8.7%
2023 33 14 42.4%
2024 24 4 16.7%
2025 43 2 4.7%
2026 17 0 0.0%

80 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 519 1.9% 10.0% 85.9% 1.5%
2 357 9.5% 17.9% 60.2% 6.2%
3 219 11.4% 12.3% 66.7% 3.2%
4 166 9.0% 10.2% 66.9% 8.4%
5 109 13.8% 11.9% 61.5% 7.3%
6 81 19.8% 4.9% 65.4% 4.9%
7 51 17.6% 5.9% 60.8% 11.8%
8 38 15.8% 0.0% 71.1% 7.9%
9 19 10.5% 0.0% 78.9% 5.3%
10 13 7.7% 0.0% 76.9% 7.7%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.7%
2009
2.9%
2010
4.8%
2011
6.9%
2012
7.8%
2013
7.3%
2014
18.8%
2015
25.3%
2016
10.8%
2017
18.6%
2018
6.8%
2019
5.4%
2020
4.9%
2021
10.2%
2022
12.0%
2023
11.0%
2024
7.9%
2025
23.5%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.