AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jason S Tiedeman

Examiner Jason S Tiedeman appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 25.6%, they average 3.36 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.36
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-4594
Predicted Supervisor
Robert Morgan
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6773
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
371
Granted Applications
95
Non-Granted Applications
276
Avg OA / Grant
3.36
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3626 , 3683 , 3686
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 25.6% 3.36
Art Unit 62 22.5% 2.89
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 3 2 66.7%
2013 30 13 43.3%
2014 32 5 15.6%
2015 30 3 10.0%
2016 34 7 20.6%
2017 31 10 32.3%
2018 36 12 33.3%
2019 28 10 35.7%
2020 22 8 36.4%
2021 18 6 33.3%
2022 16 4 25.0%
2023 25 7 28.0%
2024 14 4 28.6%
2025 34 4 11.8%
2026 18 0 0.0%

95 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 363 3.3% 8.0% 85.1% 2.2%
2 243 5.3% 17.7% 63.8% 12.3%
3 151 13.2% 13.2% 63.6% 9.3%
4 119 16.8% 5.0% 63.0% 14.3%
5 66 19.7% 1.5% 69.7% 9.1%
6 49 20.4% 0.0% 69.4% 10.2%
7 28 14.3% 0.0% 67.9% 14.3%
8 17 17.6% 5.9% 58.8% 17.6%
9 11 45.5% 0.0% 45.5% 9.1%
10 7 57.1% 0.0% 28.6% 14.3%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
8.1%
2014
9.8%
2015
10.0%
2016
1.1%
2017
13.3%
2018
11.9%
2019
12.0%
2020
22.4%
2021
7.9%
2022
14.3%
2023
23.1%
2024
14.3%
2025
38.9%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.