AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nathan Erb

Examiner Nathan Erb appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 47.4%, they average 2.74 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.74
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-7606
Predicted Supervisor
Jeffrey Zimmerman
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-4602
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
650
Granted Applications
308
Non-Granted Applications
342
Avg OA / Grant
2.74
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3628
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 47.4% 2.74
Art Unit 66 30.9% 2.32
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 19 2 10.5%
2009 31 13 41.9%
2010 36 17 47.2%
2011 28 17 60.7%
2012 37 26 70.3%
2013 30 20 66.7%
2014 21 5 23.8%
2015 42 7 16.7%
2016 45 13 28.9%
2017 30 9 30.0%
2018 36 20 55.6%
2019 37 16 43.2%
2020 43 30 69.8%
2021 33 21 63.6%
2022 38 26 68.4%
2023 45 31 68.9%
2024 36 25 69.4%
2025 42 10 23.8%
2026 21 0 0.0%

308 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 649 10.2% 1.8% 71.2% 1.7%
2 443 20.1% 0.5% 70.0% 3.8%
3 249 21.7% 0.0% 70.3% 6.0%
4 170 28.2% 0.6% 67.1% 2.4%
5 96 35.4% 0.0% 58.3% 3.1%
6 63 33.3% 0.0% 54.0% 9.5%
7 37 29.7% 0.0% 67.6% 2.7%
8 30 33.3% 0.0% 63.3% 3.3%
9 22 50.0% 4.5% 40.9% 4.5%
10 14 57.1% 0.0% 42.9% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
6.0%
2009
4.7%
2010
6.3%
2011
3.4%
2012
6.8%
2013
16.0%
2014
34.3%
2015
43.5%
2016
32.5%
2017
30.4%
2018
23.1%
2019
20.0%
2020
20.6%
2021
36.4%
2022
12.8%
2023
23.2%
2024
34.2%
2025
57.1%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.