AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tonya Joseph

Examiner Tonya Joseph appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 21.2%, they average 3.12 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.12
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1361
Predicted Supervisor
Shannon Campbell
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-5587
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
631
Granted Applications
134
Non-Granted Applications
497
Avg OA / Grant
3.12
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3628
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 21.2% 3.12
Art Unit 66 30.9% 2.32
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 19 1 5.3%
2009 31 7 22.6%
2010 33 12 36.4%
2011 19 4 21.1%
2012 24 4 16.7%
2013 32 9 28.1%
2014 33 0 0.0%
2015 39 5 12.8%
2016 39 4 10.3%
2017 33 3 9.1%
2018 55 12 21.8%
2019 39 15 38.5%
2020 47 16 34.0%
2021 14 6 42.9%
2022 39 15 38.5%
2023 35 11 31.4%
2024 30 8 26.7%
2025 50 2 4.0%
2026 20 0 0.0%

134 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 636 15.7% 8.2% 68.7% 3.6%
2 447 23.9% 4.3% 64.2% 4.7%
3 288 27.4% 3.5% 63.2% 3.8%
4 211 30.8% 0.9% 63.5% 2.4%
5 127 33.1% 0.8% 61.4% 2.4%
6 91 36.3% 0.0% 61.5% 1.1%
7 53 37.7% 1.9% 52.8% 7.5%
8 39 51.3% 2.6% 46.2% 0.0%
9 24 54.2% 0.0% 45.8% 0.0%
10 16 56.3% 0.0% 43.8% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
2.1%
2013
19.7%
2014
35.1%
2015
39.7%
2016
35.7%
2017
39.3%
2018
40.9%
2019
40.2%
2020
35.1%
2021
42.7%
2022
55.4%
2023
57.1%
2024
50.0%
2025
70.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.