AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kimberly L. Evans

Examiner Kimberly L. Evans appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 11.3%, they average 4.30 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 4.30
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3929
Predicted Supervisor
Lynda Jasmin
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6782
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
389
Granted Applications
44
Non-Granted Applications
345
Avg OA / Grant
4.30
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3629
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 11.3% 4.30
Art Unit 30 21.3% 2.88
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 13 1 7.7%
2009 23 1 4.3%
2010 17 7 41.2%
2011 12 0 0.0%
2012 20 1 5.0%
2013 21 0 0.0%
2014 21 2 9.5%
2015 23 3 13.0%
2016 25 1 4.0%
2017 25 1 4.0%
2018 29 3 10.3%
2019 24 3 12.5%
2020 18 2 11.1%
2021 20 2 10.0%
2022 29 11 37.9%
2023 22 5 22.7%
2024 13 1 7.7%
2025 27 0 0.0%
2026 7 0 0.0%

44 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 389 1.0% 15.4% 82.0% 0.3%
2 295 4.7% 8.5% 86.1% 0.0%
3 208 2.9% 6.7% 90.4% 0.0%
4 167 4.8% 7.2% 86.2% 1.2%
5 109 10.1% 4.6% 85.3% 0.0%
6 79 2.5% 2.5% 94.9% 0.0%
7 51 3.9% 2.0% 94.1% 0.0%
8 30 3.3% 0.0% 96.7% 0.0%
9 15 6.7% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
10 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
1.1%
2009
5.0%
2010
1.3%
2011
3.0%
2012
3.7%
2013
2.4%
2014
1.0%
2015
24.7%
2016
3.5%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.4%
2021
4.5%
2022
3.6%
2023
0.0%
2024
12.2%
2025
14.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.