AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Adam Alharbi

Examiner Adam Alharbi appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 81.6%, they average 1.77 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.77
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(313) 446-6621
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
663
Granted Applications
541
Non-Granted Applications
122
Avg OA / Grant
1.77
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3663
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 81.6% 1.77
Art Unit 51 58.1% 1.91
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 30 21 70.0%
2012 76 66 86.8%
2013 52 48 92.3%
2014 43 42 97.7%
2015 63 58 92.1%
2016 44 42 95.5%
2017 43 40 93.0%
2018 41 40 97.6%
2019 29 23 79.3%
2020 30 28 93.3%
2021 25 22 88.0%
2022 27 22 81.5%
2023 33 27 81.8%
2024 55 45 81.8%
2025 48 17 35.4%
2026 24 0 0.0%

541 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 662 0.5% 21.9% 72.2% 0.6%
2 311 0.0% 7.1% 91.0% 0.3%
3 117 0.9% 3.4% 94.0% 0.0%
4 55 3.6% 5.5% 89.1% 0.0%
5 25 0.0% 0.0% 92.0% 0.0%
6 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
14.3%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.0%
2016
1.6%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.8%
2024
1.2%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.