AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jalal Cengiz Coduroglu

Examiner Jalal Cengiz Coduroglu appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 75.2%, they average 1.96 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.96
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(408) 918-7527
Predicted Supervisor
Hunter Lonsberry
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7298
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
323
Granted Applications
243
Non-Granted Applications
80
Avg OA / Grant
1.96
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3665
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 75.2% 1.96
Art Unit 50 44.6% 2.00
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 38 29 76.3%
2021 53 40 75.5%
2022 45 38 84.4%
2023 60 53 88.3%
2024 62 56 90.3%
2025 53 27 50.9%
2026 12 0 0.0%

243 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 319 3.1% 12.5% 66.5% 1.3%
2 153 0.7% 17.0% 71.9% 3.9%
3 74 0.0% 5.4% 85.1% 1.4%
4 41 0.0% 2.4% 95.1% 2.4%
5 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
7 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
3.2%
2020
5.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
3.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.