AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jalatee Worjloh

Appears inactive Last observed office action: October 2025 (8 months ago).

Examiner Jalatee Worjloh appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 1.6%, they average 7.00 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 7.00
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
17 years (2009-2025)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3680 - Business Methods: Electronic Shopping and Health Care

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
62
Granted Applications
1
Non-Granted Applications
61
Avg OA / Grant
7.00
Last OA Observed
October 2025 (8 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3685 , 3692
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 1.6% 7.00
Art Unit 59 34.4% 3.05
Group 288 29.2% 2.79
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 2020 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 4 0 0.0%
2010 6 0 0.0%
2011 9 1 11.1%
2012 8 0 0.0%
2013 6 0 0.0%
2014 12 0 0.0%
2015 3 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2016.
2017 1 0 0.0%
2018 4 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2019.
2020 2 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2021-2024.
2025 7 0 0.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

1 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 56 1.8% 8.9% 85.7% 3.6%
2 38 2.6% 10.5% 78.9% 7.9%
3 23 4.3% 17.4% 65.2% 8.7%
4 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
6 5 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0%
7 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
5.6%
2011
4.8%
2012
5.6%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.