AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jagdish Patel

Appears inactive Last observed office action: January 2018 (101 months ago).

Examiner Jagdish Patel appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 72.2%, they average 1.87 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §101, with meaningful §101 activity and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.87
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2008-2018)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3690 - Business Methods - Finance/Banking/ Insurance and Business Cryptography

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
360
Granted Applications
260
Non-Granted Applications
100
Avg OA / Grant
1.87
Last OA Observed
January 2018 (101 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3693 , 3696
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 72.2% 1.87
Art Unit 27 31.4% 2.44
Group 163 34.9% 2.69
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 27 24 88.9%
2009 58 50 86.2%
2010 44 36 81.8%
2011 43 40 93.0%
2012 41 37 90.2%
2013 47 42 89.4%
2014 19 3 15.8%
2015 32 5 15.6%
2016 32 15 46.9%
2017 16 7 43.8%
2018 1 1 100.0%
No observed data after 2018; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

260 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 399 15.5% 15.0% 27.3% 25.6%
2 224 37.5% 4.9% 19.6% 25.9%
3 114 42.1% 3.5% 17.5% 25.4%
4 55 47.3% 3.6% 10.9% 29.1%
5 28 57.1% 3.6% 7.1% 14.3%
6 14 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 28.6%
7 9 55.6% 11.1% 0.0% 11.1%
8 4 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
16.5%
2008
8.1%
2009
8.7%
2010
6.8%
2011
12.2%
2012
9.0%
2013
47.7%
2014
63.9%
2015
51.8%
2016
63.2%
2017
100.0%
2018

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.