AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Milap Shah

Examiner Milap Shah appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.2%, they average 1.88 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.88
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1723
Predicted Supervisor
Kang Hu
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1344
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3710 - Amusement and Education Devices

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
887
Granted Applications
596
Non-Granted Applications
291
Avg OA / Grant
1.88
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3714 , 3715 , 3717
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.2% 1.88
Art Unit 13 53.3% 2.55
Group 168 40.8% 2.15
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 49 24 49.0%
2009 38 22 57.9%
2010 68 20 29.4%
2011 59 31 52.5%
2012 52 36 69.2%
2013 57 44 77.2%
2014 54 42 77.8%
2015 56 39 69.6%
2016 47 36 76.6%
2017 48 33 68.8%
2018 51 34 66.7%
2019 44 36 81.8%
2020 53 36 67.9%
2021 44 37 84.1%
2022 39 37 94.9%
2023 41 38 92.7%
2024 42 35 83.3%
2025 31 16 51.6%
2026 14 0 0.0%

596 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 879 8.3% 22.8% 50.7% 7.7%
2 390 6.2% 17.9% 61.3% 6.2%
3 176 2.8% 15.3% 66.5% 10.8%
4 93 4.3% 18.3% 62.4% 14.0%
5 45 4.4% 24.4% 55.6% 8.9%
6 26 11.5% 23.1% 57.7% 3.8%
7 12 0.0% 33.3% 41.7% 25.0%
8 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.8%
2008
0.9%
2009
1.7%
2010
2.8%
2011
0.0%
2012
1.4%
2013
5.6%
2014
7.8%
2015
7.7%
2016
4.8%
2017
12.9%
2018
6.6%
2019
2.6%
2020
7.0%
2021
23.2%
2022
21.1%
2023
29.2%
2024
25.0%
2025
14.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.