AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Daniel Lane

Examiner Daniel Lane appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 3.6%, they average 3.08 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.08
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2015-2026)
Phone
(303) 297-4311
Predicted Supervisor
Xuan Thai
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7147
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3710 - Amusement and Education Devices

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
331
Granted Applications
12
Non-Granted Applications
319
Avg OA / Grant
3.08
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3715
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 3.6% 3.08
Art Unit 73 35.3% 2.27
Group 168 40.8% 2.15
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2015; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2015 10 0 0.0%
2016 23 0 0.0%
2017 22 0 0.0%
2018 36 0 0.0%
2019 29 4 13.8%
2020 28 5 17.9%
2021 19 2 10.5%
2022 31 1 3.2%
2023 23 0 0.0%
2024 40 0 0.0%
2025 47 0 0.0%
2026 23 0 0.0%

12 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 327 10.4% 24.8% 59.6% 4.9%
2 197 11.7% 35.0% 43.7% 9.6%
3 92 16.3% 30.4% 44.6% 8.7%
4 67 14.9% 26.9% 38.8% 17.9%
5 37 10.8% 21.6% 29.7% 37.8%
6 21 14.3% 14.3% 23.8% 47.6%
7 11 18.2% 27.3% 36.4% 18.2%
8 8 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 50.0%
9 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%
10 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
4.3%
2015
6.2%
2016
8.1%
2017
32.9%
2018
11.8%
2019
5.9%
2020
17.1%
2021
25.0%
2022
13.0%
2023
2.7%
2024
2.6%
2025
4.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.