Examiner Lindsay M. Low

Grant ratio: 60.1% (19th percentile in Art Unit 3721 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.05. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2024
Grant ratio 60.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.05
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83289
Primary art unit
3721
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
306
Granted applications
184

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 64.4% 1.67
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 607 office actions across 306 applications
Applications with office actions 98.4% 301 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.6%
1 OA 120 39.2%
2 OAs 100 32.7%
3 OAs 48 15.7%
4 OAs 25 8.2%
5+ OAs 8 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 49.1% 2008 2009: 55.1% 2009 2010: 59.3% 2010 2011: 79.0% 2011 2012: 75.7% 2012 2013: 100.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 9.1% 2015 2020: 50.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 0.0% 2022 2024: 100.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008532649.1%
2009693855.1%
2010593559.3%
2011624979.0%
2012372875.7%
201333100.0%
2014200.0%
20151119.1%
20206350.0%
2021200.0%
2022100.0%
202411100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 301 0.0% 18.3% 68.8% 10.0%
Action 2 181 0.6% 12.2% 75.1% 6.1%
Action 3 81 0.0% 11.1% 84.0% 1.2%
Action 4 33 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 6.1%
Action 5 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 6 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 1 office actions
All years 0.2% 1 of 607 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 31. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 6 affirmed in part, and 22 reversed.

Full reversal rate
71.0% 22/31 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
90.3% 28/31 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.2 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 20, 2013 11/786,933 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 30, 2013 11/544,479 Affirmed §103
Apr. 23, 2013 11/367,009 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 29, 2013 11/923,023 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 13, 2012 11/434,713 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 30, 2012 11/620,199 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 8, 2012 11/675,528 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 29, 2012 10/191,203 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 1, 2012 11/209,372 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2012 11/188,545 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 24, 2012 10/564,761 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Aug. 17, 2012 11/796,041 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.