Examiner David Redding

Grant ratio: 82.3% (97th percentile in Art Unit 3723 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 82.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.40
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68235
Primary art unit
3723
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,318
Granted applications
1,085

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 44.4% 1.69
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.39 1,848 office actions across 1,325 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,325 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 952 71.8%
2 OAs 286 21.6%
3 OAs 54 4.1%
4 OAs 15 1.1%
5+ OAs 18 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 88.9% 2007 2008: 70.0% 2008 2009: 67.0% 2009 2010: 73.0% 2010 2011: 76.5% 2011 2012: 75.4% 2012 2013: 81.4% 2013 2014: 81.2% 2014 2015: 83.8% 2015 2016: 89.4% 2016 2017: 85.6% 2017 2018: 94.4% 2018 2019: 90.3% 2019 2020: 92.3% 2020 2021: 92.2% 2021 2022: 89.4% 2022 2023: 93.6% 2023 2024: 88.5% 2024 2025: 25.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20079888.9%
2008805670.0%
20091067167.0%
20101007373.0%
2011987576.5%
2012614675.4%
2013977981.4%
2014695681.2%
2015806783.8%
2016665989.4%
2017907785.6%
2018716794.4%
2019625690.3%
2020656092.3%
2021514792.2%
2022665989.4%
2023787393.6%
2024615488.5%
20258225.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,325 0.6% 24.2% 49.1% 13.5%
Action 2 373 0.3% 18.0% 55.2% 13.7%
Action 3 87 0.0% 16.1% 51.7% 19.5%
Action 4 33 0.0% 24.2% 54.5% 3.0%
Action 5 18 0.0% 22.2% 50.0% 22.2%
Action 6 9 0.0% 55.6% 22.2% 11.1%
Action 7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 132 office actions
All years 0.5% 9 of 1,848 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 22, 2012 10/858,654 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.