AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David B. Thomas

Examiner David B. Thomas appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 74.7%, they average 1.39 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.39
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
20 years (2007-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-4497
Predicted Supervisor
Anna Kinsaul
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1926
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3720 - Manufacturing Devices and Processes, Machine Tools and Hand Tools

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,427
Granted Applications
1,066
Non-Granted Applications
361
Avg OA / Grant
1.39
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3723
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 74.7% 1.39
Art Unit 80 49.1% 1.69
Group 306 53.9% 1.76
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 4 1 25.0%
2008 79 47 59.5%
2009 146 97 66.4%
2010 137 104 75.9%
2011 93 78 83.9%
2012 117 84 71.8%
2013 86 70 81.4%
2014 78 65 83.3%
2015 86 69 80.2%
2016 87 72 82.8%
2017 77 54 70.1%
2018 54 40 74.1%
2019 36 29 80.6%
2020 46 39 84.8%
2021 43 38 88.4%
2022 43 37 86.0%
2023 53 48 90.6%
2024 78 63 80.8%
2025 62 31 50.0%
2026 22 0 0.0%

1,066 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,422 0.6% 29.0% 42.8% 12.3%
2 311 0.6% 28.9% 48.9% 10.3%
3 104 0.0% 29.8% 50.0% 12.5%
4 41 0.0% 24.4% 61.0% 9.8%
5 17 0.0% 5.9% 70.6% 23.5%
6 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 12.5%
7 5 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0%
8 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.5%
2008
0.3%
2009
0.5%
2010
0.8%
2011
0.7%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
2.4%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
2.1%
2022
1.5%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.