Examiner Shay Lynn Karls

Grant ratio: 64.6% (75th percentile in Art Unit 3723 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.57. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.57
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79601
Primary art unit
3723
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
1,368
Granted applications
884
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1268
Supervisor
Monica Carter
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4475

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 44.4% 1.69
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.53 2,087 office actions across 1,368 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,360 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 0.6%
1 OA 857 62.6%
2 OAs 359 26.2%
3 OAs 93 6.8%
4 OAs 37 2.7%
5+ OAs 14 1.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 56.3% 2007 2008: 36.4% 2008 2009: 51.0% 2009 2010: 61.3% 2010 2011: 62.9% 2011 2012: 61.0% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 71.1% 2014 2015: 75.3% 2015 2016: 73.0% 2016 2017: 63.9% 2017 2018: 73.5% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 80.0% 2020 2021: 73.5% 2021 2022: 80.3% 2022 2023: 73.0% 2023 2024: 78.3% 2024 2025: 43.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200716956.3%
2008552036.4%
2009964951.0%
2010804961.3%
2011704462.9%
2012825061.0%
2013756080.0%
2014765471.1%
2015735575.3%
2016745473.0%
2017613963.9%
2018685073.5%
2019605083.3%
2020655280.0%
2021685073.5%
2022715780.3%
2023745473.0%
2024695478.3%
2025793443.0%
20265600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,360 0.9% 4.0% 79.3% 3.8%
Action 2 503 0.2% 3.0% 84.9% 1.6%
Action 3 144 0.0% 2.1% 91.7% 2.8%
Action 4 51 0.0% 2.0% 88.2% 2.0%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 3 of 323 office actions
All years 0.6% 13 of 2,087 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.7%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
38.5% 5/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
69.2% 9/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.1 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 23, 2025 17/501,186 Affirmed §103
Mar. 8, 2023 15/651,975 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 23, 2016 13/129,002 Reversed §103
Oct. 20, 2016 12/566,374 Reversed §103
Sep. 26, 2016 11/603,915 Reversed §103
Jun. 18, 2015 11/561,265 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 23, 2015 11/303,072 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Jun. 5, 2013 11/022,910 Affirmed §103
Jan. 31, 2013 10/707,470 Affirmed N/A
May. 22, 2012 10/958,852 Reversed §103
Aug. 17, 2011 10/958,752 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 9, 2011 11/141,534 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.