Examiner Andrew A. Horton

Grant ratio: 74.0% (89th percentile in Art Unit 3723 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88337
Primary art unit
3723
Work group
3720
Technology center
3700
Applications
787
Granted applications
582
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5039
Supervisor
Monica S. Carter
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4475

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 87 44.4% 1.69
Group 314 51.5% 1.76
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.73 1,361 office actions across 787 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 781 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.8%
1 OA 438 55.7%
2 OAs 209 26.6%
3 OAs 71 9.0%
4 OAs 42 5.3%
5+ OAs 21 2.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 74.5% 2012 2013: 79.4% 2013 2014: 68.3% 2014 2015: 53.1% 2015 2016: 74.6% 2016 2017: 87.9% 2017 2018: 83.1% 2018 2019: 88.9% 2019 2020: 84.0% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 87.0% 2022 2023: 93.5% 2023 2024: 79.5% 2024 2025: 58.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012473574.5%
2013635079.4%
2014634368.3%
2015492653.1%
2016675074.6%
2017585187.9%
2018594983.1%
2019726488.9%
2020252184.0%
2021484287.5%
2022232087.0%
2023625893.5%
2024443579.5%
2025653858.5%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 781 0.6% 17.3% 63.5% 17.7%
Action 2 343 0.3% 17.5% 71.4% 9.3%
Action 3 134 0.0% 13.4% 70.9% 14.9%
Action 4 63 0.0% 9.5% 77.8% 12.7%
Action 5 21 0.0% 4.8% 81.0% 14.3%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 214 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,361 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
7.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 15, 2020 15/086,195 Affirmed §103
Jan. 8, 2019 14/368,379 Reversed §103
Nov. 15, 2018 14/107,281 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 31, 2018 12/755,766 Affirmed N/A
May. 15, 2018 13/806,517 Reversed §100 · §103
Jun. 27, 2017 13/323,325 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.